- Data distribution
- Using the Archive
- Gemini Home
- Telescopes and Sites
- Science Visitors at Gemini
- Observing With Gemini
- Retired Instruments
- Visiting Instrument Policy
- Visiting Instrument Telescope Interfaces
- DSSI Speckle Camera
- TEXES (North)
- Integration Time Calculators
- Magnitudes and Fluxes
- Near-IR Resources
- Mid-IR Resources
- Observing Condition Constraints
- Performance Monitoring
- SV/Demo Science
- Future Instrumentation & Current Development
- Queue and Schedules
- Data and Results
- Calibration Data Retrieval
- Past/Future Development
Change page style:
Spectroscopy SV nearing completion
10 June 2004
We are nearly complete with the Science Verification (SV) of the near-infrared spectroscopy mode of Altair. During the three nights of June 8-10 (UT), we performed some engineering work and took the first observations using this mode. A few minor problems appeared concerning the tradeoff between spectral line profile and image quality, as well as a need for an improved flexure compensation model as detailed below. These problems are fairly minor and overall, the verification of the f/32 spectroscopic mode of NIRI+Altair appears successful. Periods during the night without SV observations were used for observations of the NIRI/Altair imaging queue and NIRI only queue.
The first half of the first night, June 8, 2004 (UT) was spent doing some engineering tests before any SV observations:
- Daytime: flexure compensation model updated.
- Use of nssetup for spectroscopic setup was tested and changes noted (x = displayed y, y = - displayed x)
- Tested guider timeout that occurred during the Classical run, fix required from Victoria
- Tested flexure compensation for long spectroscopy sequences
The flexure model proved to be inadequate and we realized that the original flexure compensation algorithm inside Altair was made for NIRI in the up-looking port, so a new model needs to be constructed for the side looking port with help from HIA. Additional flexure data were obtained during the daytime for a complete model to be implemented. Data on one SV program was collected on the night of June 8. Flexure issues were not terrible, but 30 minutes was about the maximum length of time before objects start drifting out of the slit. NIRI queue was done for the remainder of the night. Changes to nssetup were implemented in the daytime for spectroscopic acquisition on the next nights.
The remaining two nights, June 9 and 10, 2004 (UT) were mostly filled with SV Altair spectroscopy. Several non-sidereal targets were observed as well as sidereal targets. Different observing modes were also tried including one source far from the guide star, a few sources requiring spectroscopic mapping and one binary source (see images below). Typically, a centering check was required every 30 minutes or so while taking spectra, although this was somewhat dependent on the sky position and the specific program (as some programs require more strict slit placement than others). Performance seemed in line with expectations including the resolution of narrowly separated components.
One issue that was noted early on is the use of the order-sorting filter. This is a particularly important issue for the H band. If the H-order sorting filter is used for f/32 Altair spectroscopy, the image quality along the slit suffers because with the H-order sorting filter, the NIRI internal focus is set for maximum line profile quality (ideal for high-resolution spectroscopy). If the H filter is used rather than the H-order sorting filter, image quality is maximized at the expense of line profile shape (ideal for low-resolution spectroscopy). The extent of the image versus line-profile tradeoff and what to do about is going to be further examined during daytime. In the mean time, it is probably best to use the H filter for low-resolution spectra and the H-order sorting filter for high-resolution spectra. In J and K band observations, the sorting filters work well and should be used normally.
Above: Spectroscopy of a binary source. The primary and secondary are separated by about 0.4", with about 3 magnitudes of flux difference. The instrument alignment angle was rotated to put the slit across both the primary and the secondary and the spectra were easily resolved. This screenshot is from a 30 second exposure in K-band using the K-order sorting filter.
Above: First image: a marginally resolved object. This object is known to be about 155 mas across with an elongated appearance. Convolving 155 mas with the ~65 mas point spread function yields an apparent expected size of 168 mas. The full width at half maximum of the point spread function is outlined in red, and is about 131 mas x 175 mas (6x8 pixels), consistent with expectation. Second image: the slit has been placed across the short axis of the object. Note that there is some scattered light in the slit image. We believe this is due to light scattering off the inside surface of the slit, which is an uncoated metallic material (matte coating was applied to slitmask before slit cutting).
Last update Aug 30, 2005; Chad Trujillo.